A Good Process Gets Results

Companies in the lower mid-market often are surprised when they attract attention from larger entities, even those whose balance sheets dwarf the target.

I moderated a panel discussion on Strategic Sales at the May M&A Source conference. The session looked at three case studies:

  • A small regional bread company in the organic space sold to a public company
  • A transportation company with $1M in revenues sold to a $3B conglomerate
  • A gluten-free baked goods company acquired, built and then resold

Why do small companies attract this kind of interest?

Small companies often are more agile.

Large companies have difficulty innovating quickly enough to capitalize on trends. Two of the case studies were in sectors previously considered alternative but now considered mainstream: organic and gluten-free.

In an article in Food Dive, Carolyn Heneghan notes that consumer tastes are rapidly changing and popular brands are losing their luster to new products. Big food companies need innovation and sometimes find it more efficient to buy a company than start from scratch.

Small companies often have a desirable market niche.

In the transportation company case study, the operator had developed deep inroads in a foreign market. The buyer group wanted to reach that market quickly. It was more productive to buy the tiny company than to start from scratch.

A good M&A process is critical.

With the bread company, the advisor worked with owners to delay a sale for over a year while the production methodologies, distribution network and internal operations were fully documented and put in order to satisfy an acquirer.

With the transportation company, the M&A advisor insisted on preparing a full sales information package even through there was really only one logical buyer. It would have been tempting to just rely on an exchange of documents. But the information package helped show the opportunity clearly to the ultimate buyer.

With the snack enterprise, the investment group developed a detailed growth plan and then worked with the management team to rapidly ramp up production and sales. The company went from $7 million in sales to over $120 million within three years.

These results are extraordinary, and can’t be duplicated in every case. However, they illustrate the value of a good advisor and a good M&A process.

What our clients are saying...

“New Image Coatings, owners of Seal-Once, retained Business Transition Strategies in April of 2015 to locate a strategic buyer for the company. This was successfully completed during April of 2016 when we were acquired by UC Coatings of Buffalo, New York. Working at our side throughout this process were John Howe director, and Ken Schaefer, deputy director, of Business Transition Strategies. From the start of the project, where the information memorandum was developed, to helping us create the management presentation to acquirers, through negotiating the letter of intent and then the definitive agreement, they were there with me and our professional team every step of the way. It took nearly one year to the day to complete the project, but they never lost focus on my best interests and helped me keep my eye on business. This sale was very complex. It included transfer of trade secrets from the product developer, …as well as the transfer of a manufacturing and licensing agreement we had with the core compound producer… John and Ken marketed the company to a range of strategic acquirers, including a number of private equity groups and their platform companies, which ultimately resulted in an agreement with United Coatings… BTS’s level of expertise in the process and close attention to detail enabled us to successfully navigate the deal. I would recommend John Howe and Ken Schaefer to any company owner considering selling.”

- Hank Croteau

New Image Coatings